highly puzzled by the attitude of Fini and his policy in this phase. We are in the aftermath of local elections that returned full force action of the government, emphasizing the well-deserved local role of the League, only real parts of the territory and awarded as such by voters.
So there are the conditions to go ahead and do it with the construct, leaving behind toxic substances and processes: the reforms, the economy, employment, security ....
A fortiori, the outputs of Fini - but the heavy blow it collects a large portion former aennini that prefer the stability of political reference - are incomprehensible. According to him, the League should be curbed and management needs to be more collegial.
On the first point, one wonders why. Perhaps because the joke autonomy Bossi and Calderoli, or the folklore of the people of Po? If so, the breath is short of Finian: the League, which governs, does it well, with administrators who say (and do) for people what people want to hear and see. And if things are rough, as claimed by some, frankly do not see why we should worry about: for decades we have had to put up with the nonsense about the "class struggle", the proletariat, the workers, a category of infinite roughness, and now we should worry for instances - often justified, among other things - the League? The difference is that, at that time, the "proletarians" did not want them no, and remained in opposition. Today the League of the vote. Or do we want a democracy selective (you can, even if you do not vote, you can not, even if you vote for)?
The second, at least, can agree on, and you can find a common ground. The management of the PDL - as a party - is perplexing. Local situations are handled with personalistic and little sense of reality. The story of Puglia - where Vendola flutters a success that it is actually a defaillance opponents - should be taught. But
Liguria is also our school as a Congress, as elected local positions from the base? Perhaps in this way, even here you could create the conditions for an alternative to bad left Liguria. That governs it manages the power in the Soviet way, but even more so for lack of opponents.
So there are the conditions to go ahead and do it with the construct, leaving behind toxic substances and processes: the reforms, the economy, employment, security ....
A fortiori, the outputs of Fini - but the heavy blow it collects a large portion former aennini that prefer the stability of political reference - are incomprehensible. According to him, the League should be curbed and management needs to be more collegial.
On the first point, one wonders why. Perhaps because the joke autonomy Bossi and Calderoli, or the folklore of the people of Po? If so, the breath is short of Finian: the League, which governs, does it well, with administrators who say (and do) for people what people want to hear and see. And if things are rough, as claimed by some, frankly do not see why we should worry about: for decades we have had to put up with the nonsense about the "class struggle", the proletariat, the workers, a category of infinite roughness, and now we should worry for instances - often justified, among other things - the League? The difference is that, at that time, the "proletarians" did not want them no, and remained in opposition. Today the League of the vote. Or do we want a democracy selective (you can, even if you do not vote, you can not, even if you vote for)?
The second, at least, can agree on, and you can find a common ground. The management of the PDL - as a party - is perplexing. Local situations are handled with personalistic and little sense of reality. The story of Puglia - where Vendola flutters a success that it is actually a defaillance opponents - should be taught. But
Liguria is also our school as a Congress, as elected local positions from the base? Perhaps in this way, even here you could create the conditions for an alternative to bad left Liguria. That governs it manages the power in the Soviet way, but even more so for lack of opponents.
0 comments:
Post a Comment