Thousands and thousands of topics, dear friends of the box, which for some time - an accomplice unexpected snag computing - virtual missed your train to circulate ideas and affairs.
There is, really: federalism, the World Cup, the increasingly convoluted mayoress conduct of jellyfish, trains and buses, the oil spill, the wiretaps
... There will be no way, I hope. But the first thing I bring for your consideration is the situation of Pomigliano d'Arco and the refusal dogmatic ideology, the CGIL to sign the agreement with Fiat.
An agreement that calls for commitment to employees, and some sacrifice. But that basically says: If we do so, we bring here from Poland (from Poland), the production line of the Fiat Panda. There is no alternative: if the proposal does not pass the Fiat, the plant closes. Point. The CGIL
says no, only the trade unions. And the suspicion that behind there is something different from simple reasons for workers is strong. We try to push
But beyond the impressions, with some analytical notes. The first. The CGIL - is clear - now more than ever it is already connected to a logic of power that pits two sides. Its not an ideological and class-time, are now often the result of logical policies should be looking for a result, if not opportunistic. Being the only union, with a few letters by themselves, always oppose Berlusconi and center right weight, in terms of tiles, because you can ride a discontent that has always existed and always will exist, but wielding the sword of purism and the "me-me-not-sell". Say no to
Pomigliano, abort the logic, helps to eliminate a dangerous governmental success by political and trade union because it is equally certain that the ministers of the team he would boast. The second
. The CGIL - on a closer union - fears, not without justification, that the recipe Pomigliano may extend to many other industrial complexes of the Peninsula. It 's true that the youthful repertoire (bad, I find it incredible that there are those who claim otherwise) the seventies of Italian industrialization, but probably would relax the caution with which the union workers are all too thoroughly enjoyed the war. This, the component of the metalworkers' trade union CGIL - the base of operations and handling and holds the reins of the federal government - can not afford.
And so, the space "much worse, the better." With the real risk that Pomigliano closes. And that the proponents of the "O all or nothing" - few would say Montanelli, useless and senseless - take hostage one of the few factories in Campania and one of the few productions that an Italian company is trying valiantly to maintain or even back to us.
There is, really: federalism, the World Cup, the increasingly convoluted mayoress conduct of jellyfish, trains and buses, the oil spill, the wiretaps
... There will be no way, I hope. But the first thing I bring for your consideration is the situation of Pomigliano d'Arco and the refusal dogmatic ideology, the CGIL to sign the agreement with Fiat.
An agreement that calls for commitment to employees, and some sacrifice. But that basically says: If we do so, we bring here from Poland (from Poland), the production line of the Fiat Panda. There is no alternative: if the proposal does not pass the Fiat, the plant closes. Point. The CGIL
says no, only the trade unions. And the suspicion that behind there is something different from simple reasons for workers is strong. We try to push
But beyond the impressions, with some analytical notes. The first. The CGIL - is clear - now more than ever it is already connected to a logic of power that pits two sides. Its not an ideological and class-time, are now often the result of logical policies should be looking for a result, if not opportunistic. Being the only union, with a few letters by themselves, always oppose Berlusconi and center right weight, in terms of tiles, because you can ride a discontent that has always existed and always will exist, but wielding the sword of purism and the "me-me-not-sell". Say no to
Pomigliano, abort the logic, helps to eliminate a dangerous governmental success by political and trade union because it is equally certain that the ministers of the team he would boast. The second
. The CGIL - on a closer union - fears, not without justification, that the recipe Pomigliano may extend to many other industrial complexes of the Peninsula. It 's true that the youthful repertoire (bad, I find it incredible that there are those who claim otherwise) the seventies of Italian industrialization, but probably would relax the caution with which the union workers are all too thoroughly enjoyed the war. This, the component of the metalworkers' trade union CGIL - the base of operations and handling and holds the reins of the federal government - can not afford.
And so, the space "much worse, the better." With the real risk that Pomigliano closes. And that the proponents of the "O all or nothing" - few would say Montanelli, useless and senseless - take hostage one of the few factories in Campania and one of the few productions that an Italian company is trying valiantly to maintain or even back to us.
0 comments:
Post a Comment